Not Everyone Hates SarbOx
Published by claudia January 23rd, 2007 in SOX Tags: compliance costs, eaton vance, investment officer, investors, sarbanes oxley, sarbox, t rowe price.The much maligned new rules are a big hit with investors
There has been no shortage of public outcry over Sarbanes-Oxley, the controversial 2002 accounting reform legislation that requires top corporate executives to fill out reams of new forms and personally certify their financial reports. SarbOx, say its critics, adds millions in compliance costs, makes life miserable for corporate directors, and encourages companies to bolt to foreign stock exchanges. The complaints have been so passionate that regulators are now planning to loosen the rules, probably before the year is out.
Not so fast, says a growing chorus of investors. Lost amid all the boos over SarbOx, they say, are some major benefits. The biggest: SarbOx and related reforms have produced much more reliable corporate financial statements, which investors rely on when deciding whether to buy or sell shares. For them, SarbOx has been a godsend.
What’s more, says Duncan W. Richardson, chief equity investment officer at Eaton Vance Management and overseer of $80 billion in stockholdings, even the act’s much disparaged requirements for testing internal financial controls could drive gains in corporate productivity and profits. Says Donald J. Peters, a portfolio manager at T. Rowe Price Group: “The accounting reforms have been a win.”
EMail This |
Print This Post |
One Response to “Not Everyone Hates SarbOx”
Leave a Reply
Search
Categories
- Accounting rules (97)
- As2 (1)
- AS5 (4)
- Asia (21)
- Company News (33)
- Conferences (8)
- coso (1)
- Europe (41)
- FEI (2)
- M&A (3)
- News (151)
- North America (124)
- paper (8)
- PCAOB (25)
- Sarbox (75)
- SEC (98)
- Section 404 (122)
- small business (23)
- SOX (228)
- SOX Automations (3)
- Study (15)
- Uncategorized (21)
- White paper (2)
Related Entries
Highest Rated Entries




(5 out of 5)



(5 out of 5)



(5 out of 5)



(5 out of 5)



(5 out of 5)



(5 out of 5)



(5 out of 5)



(5 out of 5)



(5 out of 5)



(5 out of 5)
EMail This








It’s the begining, if and when implemented in true spirit of the Act - not only the investors, but all the stakeholders will be imensely benefited since the Act introduce STRUCTURE OF COPRATE GOVERNANCE AND RISK MANAGEMENT.
Lastly, it is not at all expensive to implement as is being publicized. If one takes TOP DOWN RISK APPROACH, and draws the matrics of enterprise risks, one needs to focus only on pontetial risks of material nature.
This Act will overhaul the entire corporate structure - the organisation, management and control by risks.