Archive for the 'AS5' Category
CFOs and controllers at U.S. subsidiaries of Japanese firms begin implementing the Japanese version of Sarbanes-Oxley.
0 Comments Published by Justine June 26th, 2007 in Uncategorized, Asia, Accounting rules, Sarbox, AS5 Tags: audit trail, cfo, cfos, corporate controller, japanese version, private firm, sarbanes oxley act.This past April, Japanese pitching sensation Daisuke Matsuzaka wowed Red Sox Nation with his “gyroball.” From now until next April, Dave Sackett expects to be equally mesmerized by Japan’s version of the corporate curveball.
The corporate controller of Ulvac Technologies is charged with implementing J-SOX — the Japanese edition of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (sometimes abbreviated as […]
EMail This |
Print This Post |
SEC: No Help Needed from Congress
1 Comment Published by Justine June 26th, 2007 in Uncategorized, SEC, Section 404, Sarbox, AS5 Tags: cfo, help needed, republican congress, sarbanes oxley, securities and exchange commission. Grilling the assembled members of the Securities and Exchange Commission about Sarbanes-Oxley, Barney Frank just took the time to note “I feel compelled by the spirit of bipartisanship to come to the defense of the Republican president and the Republican Congress that passed [Sarbanes-Oxley].”
CFO.com: SEC: No Help Needed from Congress
EMail This |
Print This Post |
Ding-Dong, AS2 Is Dead
0 Comments Published by claudia May 28th, 2007 in News, SEC, SOX, Section 404, North America, Accounting rules, Sarbox, AS5, As2 Tags: accounting oversight board, as2, as5, auditing standard, audits, pcaob, public company accounting oversight board, sarbanes oxley act, securities and exchange.The PCAOB has killed its reviled internal-control standard. Now it’s up to the SEC to pronounce it officially dead.
Perhaps the most hated rule to come out of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act is dead. Well, almost. On Thursday, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board voted unanimously to replace its controversial internal-control auditing standard with Auditing Standard No. […]
EMail This |
Print This Post |
AS5 Could Trim Audit Bills by 10%
0 Comments Published by claudia May 4th, 2007 in News, SOX, Accounting rules, small business, PCAOB, Sarbox, AS5 Tags: accounting oversight board, as5, auditing standard, audit costs, filers, pcaob, publicly traded companies, public company accounting oversight board, sarbanes oxley act.The PCAOB revised Auditing Standard No. 2 mainly for small companies’ benefit. But large companies tell the regulator the new AS5 will also reduce their audit costs.
The revised auditing standard for internal control over financial reporting could bring cheaper auditing bills for large companies. Some publicly traded companies are estimating that their audit fees could […]
EMail This |
Print This Post |
Search
About
You are currently browsing the SOX Center weblog archives for the 'AS5' category.
Longer entries are truncated. Click the headline of an entry to read it in its entirety.
Latest
- Sarbanes-Oxley law has been a pretty clean sweep
- Sarbanes-Oxley drives away IPOs
- Study: Investors Say Sarbanes-Oxley Got It Right; Wish Mandatory Jail Time for Wrongdoers
- Japan insurer Millea quits Nasdaq, U.S. accounting
- Oxley says reforms’ effects overblown
- House Votes to Give Small Companies More Time on Sarbanes-Oxley
- CFOs and controllers at U.S. subsidiaries of Japanese firms begin implementing the Japanese version of Sarbanes-Oxley.
- SEC: No Help Needed from Congress
- Congress Flexes Its Regulatory Muscles
- SEC commissioners to go before House panel
Categories
- Accounting rules (97)
- As2 (1)
- AS5 (4)
- Asia (21)
- Company News (33)
- Conferences (8)
- coso (1)
- Europe (41)
- FEI (2)
- M&A (3)
- News (151)
- North America (124)
- paper (8)
- PCAOB (25)
- Sarbox (75)
- SEC (98)
- Section 404 (122)
- small business (23)
- SOX (228)
- SOX Automations (3)
- Study (15)
- Uncategorized (21)
- White paper (2)
Archives
Highest Rated Entries




(5 out of 5)



(5 out of 5)



(5 out of 5)



(5 out of 5)



(5 out of 5)



(5 out of 5)



(5 out of 5)



(5 out of 5)



(5 out of 5)



(5 out of 5)
(1 votes, average: 4 out of 5)
EMail This








