SEC Should Reconsider Sarbanes-Oxley Extensions for Small Business
0 Comments Published by claudia May 30th, 2007 in SEC, SOX, Section 404, small business, Sarbox Tags: atkins, compliance deadline, deadline extensions, john kerry, kathleen casey, sarbanes oxley act, Section 404, securities and exchange, senate committee, senators.The Office of Advocacy today praised Securities and Exchange (SEC) Commissioners Paul Atkins and Kathleen Casey for their willingness to reconsider the SEC decision not to extend the deadline for small public firm compliance with section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Advocacy wrote to the commissioners in the wake of the SEC’s decision not to grant postponement of deadlines for public firms with less than $75 million in market value.
In the letter Chief Counsel for Advocacy Thomas M. Sullivan asked the SEC to revisit the issue of compliance deadline extensions for smaller public firms. This request mirrors that of recent letters to the SEC by Senators John Kerry (D- Mass.), Chairman of the U.S. Senate Committee on Small Business & Entrepreneurship, and Olympia Snowe (R-Maine), the Ranking Member.
Kansas City infoZine News: SEC Should Reconsider Sarbanes-Oxley Extensions for Small Business
EMail This |
Print This Post |
Atkins: Still Wailing On Sarbanes-Oxley’s 404
0 Comments Published by claudia February 5th, 2007 in SEC, SOX, Section 404, North America Tags: atkins, auditing standard, compliance procedures, pcaob, sarbanes oxley act, schumer, Section 404.Commissioner Paul Atkins delivered a speech at the Corporate Directors Forum and as usual, unleashed himself on one of his favorite topics: Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Atkins, like the Paulson Committee and Bloomberg/Schumer, worried about the U.S. markets’ place in the world rather than investor information - as if the two were mutually exclusive.
His speech contained the usual complaints about the “costs” of 404. (As if there are no costs to investors or the economy as a whole for audit failures.) He cited in particular the costs incurred for compliance procedures performed by firms that were subsequently ignored by auditors. Seems like the answer is to make the auditors snap to attention, not gut the rules.While the PCAOB and the SEC continue to revise Auditing Standard No. 2, it’s good to note that their efforts aren’t wasted on Commission Atkins:
“I think almost all players in this debate have recognized the flawed approach that was initially rolled out. Last month, the SEC proposed additional guidance for management’s assessment of internal control. Around the same time, the PCAOB proposed replacing AS 2 with a new audit standard, AS 5, for an outside auditor’s attestation of internal controls. Far from being a rollback or lessening of standards, I think the new proposals go a long way toward implementing the original vision of Sarbanes-Oxley. I look forward to seeing the comments on these proposals.”
yahoo!finance: Atkins: Still Wailing On Sarbanes-Oxley’s 404
EMail This |
Print This Post |
Search
About
You are currently browsing the SOX Center weblog archives for atkins.
Categories
- Accounting rules (97)
- As2 (1)
- AS5 (4)
- Asia (21)
- Company News (33)
- Conferences (8)
- coso (1)
- Europe (41)
- FEI (2)
- M&A (3)
- News (151)
- North America (124)
- paper (8)
- PCAOB (25)
- Sarbox (75)
- SEC (98)
- Section 404 (122)
- small business (23)
- SOX (228)
- SOX Automations (3)
- Study (15)
- Uncategorized (21)
- White paper (2)
Highest Rated Entries




(5 out of 5)



(5 out of 5)



(5 out of 5)



(5 out of 5)



(5 out of 5)



(5 out of 5)



(5 out of 5)



(5 out of 5)



(5 out of 5)



(5 out of 5)
EMail This







