SOX Center

FEI announced the results of its sixth Sarbanes-Oxley compliance survey, which found that Section 404 compliance cost Corporate America less in year three of adoption than in each of the first two years. FEI polled 200 companies to gauge experiences in complying with Section 404. Responding companies have average revenues of $6.8 billion.

According to the FEI survey, which included 172 “accelerated filers”— companies with market capitalizations above $75 million — total average cost for Section 404 compliance was $2.9 million during fiscal year 2006, which represents a 23 percent decrease from 2005 totals. The data also shows reductions in internal and external costs of compliance, with internal staff time decreasing by 10 percent. The lower costs can be attributed to companies’ increased efficiencies in complying with Section 404.

FEI Survey: Management Drives Sarbanes-Oxley Compliance Costs Down, But Auditor Fees Virtually Unchanged

The PCAOB revised Auditing Standard No. 2 mainly for small companies’ benefit. But large companies tell the regulator the new AS5 will also reduce their audit costs.

The revised auditing standard for internal control over financial reporting could bring cheaper auditing bills for large companies. Some publicly traded companies are estimating that their audit fees could be reduced by 10 percent if the proposed rule is adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, Laura Phillips, the regulator’s deputy chief auditor, said on Friday.

Much of the focus on the revisions to Auditing Standard No. 2 has been how it can be made scalable for the 6,000 so-called non-accelerated filers that have yet to comply with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Those publicly traded companies with a public float of $75 million or less don’t have to have their auditor attestation reports completed until their 10-Ks are filed for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2008.

CFO.com: AS5 Could Trim Audit Bills by 10%

Former Senator Paul Sarbanes, D-Md., who, as the head of the Senate Banking Committee, co-authored the sweeping Sarbanes-Oxley reform act said he supports developing additional guidance for smaller filers but, not surprisingly, dismisses exempting those companies from compliance with the legislation’s rigid Section 404.

“Stop and think about that for a moment,” said Sarbanes in a speech before attendees at a conference on financial reporting and governance presented by Pace University’s Lubin School of Business, here. “That would mean that you would be exempting 80 percent of public companies from compliance.”

Sarbanes referred to recent pronouncements from the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding potential streamlining of the 404 internal controls provision, which small filers have complained is disproportionate to them in terms of cost and manpower.

WebCPA: SOX Co-Author Supports Tweaking Act, Not Exemption

As the SEC and PCAOB continue to revise their internal-control standards, what should small businesses do in the meantime? A few are asking senators for an extension.

More than 6,000 public companies face a serious dilemma about their Sarbanes-Oxley compliance: Should they use the current version of Section 404 now in reviewing internal controls over their financial reporting? Or should they wait until the Securities and Exchange Commission and Public Company Accounting Oversight Board issue final revisions later this year?

Decision time is approaching fast. Small businesses — or so-called non-accelerated filers — have until they file their 10-Ks for fiscal years that end on or after Dec. 15, 2007, to meet 404’s management assessment requirement. It’s a deadline that the SEC has extended several times, including that of the auditors’ attestation reports (non-accelerated filers don’t have to complete those documents until their 10-Ks are filed for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2008). And small-business advocates are hoping the SEC will extend those dates once again.

CFO.com: Could Small Biz Get Another Sarbox Reprieve?