SOX Center

As U.S. regulators and industry recognize Sarbanes-Oxley’s fifth year this July 30, most investors (57 percent) in a new survey by Pepperdine University’s Graziadio School of Business and Management believe the requirements imposed by the law, holding CEOs and senior management personally accountable for the accuracy of their companies’ financial disclosures, are about right, while one-third (31 percent) say its restrictions did not go far enough. Only eight percent say the law went too far.

The study on investor attitudes toward CEOs and their corporate boards finds almost nine out of ten investors say that jail time should be mandatory for corporate officers and board members convicted of practices harmful to employees, shareholders and the public. Four out of five investors surveyed favor actions by prosecutors to aggressively recover company losses from convicted executives and/or board members’ personal assets.

Yahoo!Finance: Study: Investors Say Sarbanes-Oxley Got It Right; Wish Mandatory Jail Time for Wrongdoers

In ‘06, public companies benefited from earlier efforts to comply with the governance measure.

Public companies spent 23 percent less adhering to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act’s accounting rules in 2006, as they benefited from work done in earlier years to comply with the landmark federal corporate-governance law, a new survey found.

Complying with the 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley Act cost companies $2.92 million on average last year, compared with $3.8 million in 2005, Financial Executives International said in a statement yesterday. Costs have fallen 35 percent from 2004, the first year companies were required to adhere to the law’s accounting requirements.

The Philadelphia Inquirer: Sarbanes-Oxley costs 23% lower