Archive Page 2
SOX Co-Author Supports Tweaking Act, Not Exemption
0 Comments Published by claudia April 30th, 2007 in SOX, Section 404, Accounting rules, small business, PCAOB, Sarbox Tags: compliance, filers, financial reporting, public companies, public company accounting oversight board, Section 404, senate banking committee, senator paul sarbanes.Former Senator Paul Sarbanes, D-Md., who, as the head of the Senate Banking Committee, co-authored the sweeping Sarbanes-Oxley reform act said he supports developing additional guidance for smaller filers but, not surprisingly, dismisses exempting those companies from compliance with the legislation’s rigid Section 404.
“Stop and think about that for a moment,” said Sarbanes in a speech before attendees at a conference on financial reporting and governance presented by Pace University’s Lubin School of Business, here. “That would mean that you would be exempting 80 percent of public companies from compliance.”
Sarbanes referred to recent pronouncements from the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding potential streamlining of the 404 internal controls provision, which small filers have complained is disproportionate to them in terms of cost and manpower.
EMail This |
Print This Post |
Could Small Biz Get Another Sarbox Reprieve?
0 Comments Published by claudia April 20th, 2007 in SEC, SOX, Section 404, Accounting rules, small business, PCAOB, Sarbox Tags: assessment requirement, filers, fiscal years, internal control standards, pcaob, public companies, public company accounting oversight board, sarbanes oxley compliance, sarbox, Section 404, small businesses.As the SEC and PCAOB continue to revise their internal-control standards, what should small businesses do in the meantime? A few are asking senators for an extension.
More than 6,000 public companies face a serious dilemma about their Sarbanes-Oxley compliance: Should they use the current version of Section 404 now in reviewing internal controls over their financial reporting? Or should they wait until the Securities and Exchange Commission and Public Company Accounting Oversight Board issue final revisions later this year?
Decision time is approaching fast. Small businesses — or so-called non-accelerated filers — have until they file their 10-Ks for fiscal years that end on or after Dec. 15, 2007, to meet 404’s management assessment requirement. It’s a deadline that the SEC has extended several times, including that of the auditors’ attestation reports (non-accelerated filers don’t have to complete those documents until their 10-Ks are filed for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2008). And small-business advocates are hoping the SEC will extend those dates once again.
EMail This |
Print This Post |
SEC Chairman: Sarbanes-Oxley Relief for Small Firms Not First Choice
0 Comments Published by claudia April 20th, 2007 in News, SEC, SOX, Section 404, Accounting rules Tags: accounting oversight board, chairman christopher cox, first choice, internal financial, public companies, public company accounting oversight board, regulators, sarbanes oxley act, sec chairman, smaller companies.Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Christopher Cox isn’t ruling out further delays in applying stricter accounting requirements on small public companies but said such relief isn’t the option preferred by regulators.
About 6,000 smaller public companies have yet to come under two requirements adopted by Congress in 2002 as part of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, calling for companies to make an annual assessment of their internal financial-reporting controls, with further review by the company’s outside auditor. Regulators have delayed applying that portion of the law to smaller companies amid complaints that compliance has been very costly and time-consuming for larger companies. In response to such complaints, the SEC and Public Company Accounting Oversight Board are working to make the requirement less burdensome for all companies.
SmartPros: SEC Chairman: Sarbanes-Oxley Relief for Small Firms Not First Choice
EMail This |
Print This Post |
Biotech Research and Development Will Benefit from Sarbanes-Oxley Changes
0 Comments Published by claudia April 18th, 2007 in Uncategorized, News, SEC, SOX, Section 404, Accounting rules Tags: accounting oversight board, chairman christopher cox, mark olsen, pcaob, public companies, securities and exchange, securities and exchange commission, sec chairman, senate committee, senate small business committee, small business committee.BIO Reiterates Support as Senate Small Business Committee Considers Changes
WASHINGTON–(BUSINESS WIRE)–As Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chairman Christopher Cox and Public Companies Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) Chairman Mark Olsen prepare to testify before the Senate Committee on Small Business & Entrepreneurship today, BIO reiterated its support for changes to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) that will specifically benefit small biotech companies.
“The biotechnology industry was particularly hard-hit by the complex and burdensome regulations imposed by SOX’s Section 404. We have supported changes to its implementation, so our companies can refocus on our most important mission of researching and developing new therapies to improve human health, expand our food supply, and provide new sources of energy,” said BIO President and CEO Jim Greenwood. “We are pleased to see that agency and congressional leaders are listening.”
Yahoo!Finance: Biotech Research and Development Will Benefit from Sarbanes-Oxley Changes
EMail This |
Print This Post |
Follow up to the High Tech Industries Conference for Financial Professional, 22th 2006
1 Comment Published by claudia September 29th, 2006 in Conferences, SOX Automations Tags: conference, cpa, financial professionals, mark jensen, public companies, sarbanes oxley, SOX Automation.This posting is sponsored by SOX Automation, Inc.
I had the pleasure to take part at the CPA High Tech Industries Conference for Financial Professionals together with my sponsor SOX Automation, Inc, at September 22th 2006.
A special thank you I like to send to Mark Jensen which is Partner & National Director, Venture Capital Services, at Deloitte & Touche LLP, for his program point: Impact of Sarbanes Oxley on Smaller Public Companies. He has given in his elaboration an deep insight about the problematics and cost explosions at smaller public companies. Our sponsor greatly appreciated also the recommendation for SOX Automation, Inc software SOX DISC®.
Especially his explanations of which steps should companies take now to ensure compliance with Sec 404 was very instructive.
Below you can see a picture, which shows me (on the left hand side) at the conference sponsor table of SOX Automation, Inc:
EMail This |
Print This Post |
Interesting Report: 92 % of Public Companies’ Revenue Processes at Risk for Compliance Failures and Restatements
0 Comments Published by claudia August 28th, 2006 in News, SOX Tags: public companies, revenue recognition, sarbanes oxley.I found a really interesting report at RevenueRecongnotion.com which says that 92% of public companies are forced to rely on spreadsheets to fill vital gaps in their revenue reporting processes—despite the fact that spreadsheets are prone to errors, lack audit capabilities, and resist internal control.
The report “Enterprise Systems and Revenue Recognition: The Missing Link”can be found at here.
EMail This |
Print This Post |
SEC offers Further Relief for Smaller Companies
0 Comments Published by claudia August 23rd, 2006 in News, SEC, SOX, Section 404 Tags: annual reports, compliance dates, compliance deadline, grant relief, private issuers, public companies, sarbanes oxley act, securities and exchange commission, smaller companies, transition period.The Securities and Exchange Commission today issued two releases to grant smaller public companies and many foreign private issuers further relief from compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.The subjects are:
1. Ref from Section 404 Compliance Dates for Smaller Companies (Non-Accelerated Filers).
The Commission is proposing to grant relief to smaller public companies by extending the date by which non-accelerated filers must start providing a report by management assessing the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting. The initial compliance date for these companies would be moved from fiscal years ending on or after July 15, 2007, until fiscal years ending on or after Dec. 15, 2007.
2. Relief from Section 404(b) Compliance Date for Certain Foreign Private Issuers.
The Commission is granting relief from Section 404(b) compliance for foreign private issuers that are accelerated filers (but not large accelerated filers), and that file their annual reports on Form 20-F or 40-F. These companies will have their compliance deadline extended for an additional year, so that they will not begin complying with the Section 404(b) requirement to provide an auditor’s attestation report on internal control over financial reporting in their annual reports until fiscal years ending on or after July 15, 2007.
3. Proposed Transition Relief for Newly Public Companies.
In the same release in which it proposes an extension of the Section 404 compliance dates for non-accelerated filers, the Commission also proposes a transition period for newly public companies.
Here you will find the press release of the SEC.
EMail This |
Print This Post |
Search
About
You are currently browsing the SOX Center weblog archives for public companies.
Categories
- Accounting rules (97)
- As2 (1)
- AS5 (4)
- Asia (21)
- Company News (33)
- Conferences (8)
- coso (1)
- Europe (41)
- FEI (2)
- M&A (3)
- News (151)
- North America (124)
- paper (8)
- PCAOB (25)
- Sarbox (75)
- SEC (98)
- Section 404 (122)
- small business (23)
- SOX (228)
- SOX Automations (3)
- Study (15)
- Uncategorized (21)
- White paper (2)
Archives
Highest Rated Entries




(5 out of 5)



(5 out of 5)



(5 out of 5)



(5 out of 5)



(5 out of 5)



(5 out of 5)



(5 out of 5)



(5 out of 5)



(5 out of 5)



(5 out of 5)
EMail This
(3 votes, average: 4.67 out of 5)







